Difference between revisions of "Talk:789 - 8. Statement"
(→Joerg: Not a statement: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<span style="color:#c0392b">Joerg</span>: I agree with Andreas | <span style="color:#c0392b">Joerg</span>: I agree with Andreas | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Joerg: Not a statement == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This again is not a statement. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 20 August 2018
Andreas:
I DO NOT THINK IT IS GOOD TO MAKE ONE MECHANISM INTO ONE OF THE STATEMENTS – IT WILL BE ANOTHER MECHANISM IN A FEW YEARS People did the same with the Cluster-Castrate model – that George Vithoulkas supported at one point
I think the work of Emilio Del Giudice and Giuliano Preparata with a coherent field are more on the right track – I have discussed this with Dr Alexander Tournier (HRI) that completely agrees. Reason being that it can explain more of the phenomena of both simillimum, aggravation, serial dilution etc. than the Nano model of Bell +++
Joerg: I agree with Andreas
Joerg: Not a statement
This again is not a statement.
