Difference between revisions of "Talk:789 - 1. Statement"
(→new ideas test: new section) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: [http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/] | Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: [http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Spero : == | ||
== new ideas test == | == new ideas test == | ||
| − | + | Im testing the process. | |
Revision as of 16:00, 1 September 2018
Andreas:
Here we also need to mention scientific proof an refer to the next point
Quote from the French minister of health saying something like: no point forbidding homeopathy if it does not work it will die out, if it works it will persist even if I forbid it ???? Ref ????
Some homeopathy quotes: https://ehomoeopathy.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/sayings-of-some-great-people-about-homoeopathy/
Arguments pro and con Homeopathy
Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/
Spero :
new ideas test
Im testing the process.
