Praxeologie: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
| [gesichtete Version] | [gesichtete Version] |
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „Vergleiche diese Informationen mit dem "Praxeology"-Eintrag im [http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Praxeology Mises Wiki]. <ref>Die Ausführungen in der Wikipedia zu […“) |
FreeW (Diskussion | Beiträge) (# Category:Wissenschaft …) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | |||
Vergleiche diese Informationen mit dem "Praxeology"-Eintrag im [http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Praxeology Mises Wiki]. <ref>Die Ausführungen in der Wikipedia zu [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praxeologie Hans Albert] sind ohne Belang. Sie würden Nihilismus bedeuten.</ref> | Vergleiche diese Informationen mit dem "Praxeology"-Eintrag im [http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Praxeology Mises Wiki]. <ref>Die Ausführungen in der Wikipedia zu [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praxeologie Hans Albert] sind ohne Belang. Sie würden Nihilismus bedeuten.</ref> | ||
| − | '''Praxeologie''' beruht auf einem apriorischen, erkenntnistheoretischen Konzept, das verständlich macht, dass das [[Handeln]] als Begriff dient, um grundlegende Zusammenhänge zwischen Lebenswelt, unseren Sinnen und dem Verstand einordnen zu können. Der Begriff des Handelns versteht sich als logische Brücke zwischen Außenwelt (Sinnen, Wahrnehmung) und Innenwelt (Verstand). Diese logische Verknüpfung erlaubt eine wachsende, in sich konsistente Theorie zu entfalten, die die Grundlage für alle Wissensbereiche bildet.<ref>Warum die Praxeologie epistemologisch fundiert und unabwendbar ist, ist im 1. Kapitel von ''[[Praxeologie für Ordnung und Sezession]]'' erläutert.</ref> | + | '''Praxeologie''' beruht auf einem apriorischen, erkenntnistheoretischen Konzept, das verständlich macht, dass das [[Handeln|Handeln]] als Begriff dient, um grundlegende Zusammenhänge zwischen Lebenswelt, unseren Sinnen und dem Verstand einordnen zu können. Der Begriff des Handelns versteht sich als logische Brücke zwischen Außenwelt (Sinnen, Wahrnehmung) und Innenwelt (Verstand). Diese logische Verknüpfung erlaubt eine wachsende, in sich konsistente Theorie zu entfalten, die die Grundlage für alle Wissensbereiche bildet.<ref>Warum die Praxeologie epistemologisch fundiert und unabwendbar ist, ist im 1. Kapitel von ''[[Praxeologie für Ordnung und Sezession]]'' erläutert.</ref> |
Die erkenntnistheoretischen Grundlagen werden täglich durch das Handeln (Hypothesen, Forschungsdesign, Verifikation und Falsifikation usw.) praktiziert. Diese Praxis ist im erweiterten Sinne wie Versuchstechnik zu verstehen - eine Theorie und Technik, um Versuche anzuordnen und auszuwerten - oder irgend eine Erkenntnis mit logischen Werkzeugen zu ermitteln (d.h. zu verstehen). Da die Aufstellung dieser Grundlagen Handlungen sind, kann der Begriff der Handlung selbst nicht mehr eliminiert werden, sondern ist bereits inhärenter, denknotwendiger Bestandteil. | Die erkenntnistheoretischen Grundlagen werden täglich durch das Handeln (Hypothesen, Forschungsdesign, Verifikation und Falsifikation usw.) praktiziert. Diese Praxis ist im erweiterten Sinne wie Versuchstechnik zu verstehen - eine Theorie und Technik, um Versuche anzuordnen und auszuwerten - oder irgend eine Erkenntnis mit logischen Werkzeugen zu ermitteln (d.h. zu verstehen). Da die Aufstellung dieser Grundlagen Handlungen sind, kann der Begriff der Handlung selbst nicht mehr eliminiert werden, sondern ist bereits inhärenter, denknotwendiger Bestandteil. | ||
| Zeile 9: | Zeile 10: | ||
Was ist nicht praxeologisch? | Was ist nicht praxeologisch? | ||
| − | Nicht praxeologisch ist jeder Versuch, Theorien und Annahmen zu kreieren und zu etablieren, der mit den denknotwendigen Voraussetzungen des Handelns (auch 'Axiom des Handelns' genannt) im Widerspruch steht. Das 'Axiom des Handelns' ist ein Paket von interdisziplinären Sub-Paketen begrifflicher Voraussetzungen möglicher Handlungen. Rechnen, Zählen und Messen sind zum Beispiel ebenfalls Handlungen ebenso wie mit anderen Menschen freiwillig zu kooperieren. Alle diese Handlungen setzen a priori die damit notwendigen Prämissen voraus. | + | Nicht praxeologisch ist jeder Versuch, Theorien und Annahmen zu kreieren und zu etablieren, der mit den denknotwendigen Voraussetzungen des Handelns (auch 'Axiom des Handelns' genannt) im Widerspruch steht. Das 'Axiom des Handelns' ist ein Paket von interdisziplinären Sub-Paketen begrifflicher Voraussetzungen möglicher Handlungen. Rechnen, Zählen und Messen sind zum Beispiel ebenfalls Handlungen ebenso wie mit anderen Menschen freiwillig zu kooperieren. Alle diese Handlungen setzen a priori die damit notwendigen Prämissen voraus. |
| + | |||
| + | == Quellen == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Order, Cooperation, Justice === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Norbert Lennartz. ''Praxeologie für Ordnung uns Sezession - Ergänzung zu Human Action''. Holzinger, 2014. | ||
| + | *Konrad S. Graf [http://konradsgraf.com/jurisprudence/ Action-Based Jurisprudence] with [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8NcrMVV27M#t=27 speech] at Australian Mises Seminar 2012. | ||
| + | *________. [http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/19-graf-action-based-jurisprudence-praxeological/ “Action-Based Jurisprudence: Praxeological Legal Theory in Relation to Economic Theory, Ethics, and Legal Practice”]. ''Libertarian Papers'' 3.19 (2011). | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Austrian Methodology === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Eugen-Maria Schulak, Herbert Unterköfler. ''Praxeology: A New Start from Ludwig von Mises'' Chp. 20 in [http://mises.org/resources/6136/ ''The Austrian School of Economics: A History of Its Ideas, Ambassadors, and Institutions'']. Mises Inst. 2011. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Richard von Strigl. Die ökonomischen Kategorien und die Organisation der Wirtschaft. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1923. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Robbins, Lionel. [http://mises.org/books/robbinsessay2.pdf ''(An Essay on) the Nature and the Significance of Economic Science.''] New York: New York University Press, 1984. (London: Macmillan, 1935). | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Ludwig von Mises. [http://mises.org/resources.aspx?Id=3250&html=1 '''Part One''']. in '''''Human Action''': A Treatise on Economics''. 1996 (first edition 1949), preceded by ''Nationalökonomie'' in 1940. | ||
| + | *_______. 1962. [http://mises.org/ufofes.asp '''''The Ultimate Foundation of the Economic Science''''']. | ||
| + | *_______. 1933. [http://mises.org/epofe.asp ''The Epistemological Problems of Economics'']. 1933, 1960. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/epofe.asp ''Epistemological Problems Of Economics'']. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.de/texte/mises/Grundprobleme.html ''Grundprobleme der Nationalökonomie'']. (German) | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/epofe/c5sec0.asp ''Remarks on the Fundamental Problem of the Subjective Theory of Value'']. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.de/texte/wertlehre1928/index.html ''Bemerkungen zum Grundproblem der subjektivistischen Wertlehre'']. (German) | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/th.asp " ''Theory and History'']. (Philosophy of Science, Epistemology) | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/ufofes.asp ''The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science'']. (Philosophy of Science, Epistemology) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *F. A. Hayek. [http://www.econlib.org/Library/Essays/hykKnw1.html ''The Use of Knowledge in Society'']. 1945. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Murray N. Rothbard "Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller." American Economic Review, December 1951. | ||
| + | *_______. 1957. [http://mises.org/rothbard/extreme.pdf '''''In Defense of Extreme Apriorism.'''''] Southern Economic Journal 23, no. 3 (1957): 314-20. | ||
| + | *_______. 1976. [http://mises.org/rothbard/praxeology.pdf " ''Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics'']. Austrian Economics, ed. Edwin G Dolan, Sheed & Ward.([http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard38.html html]). | ||
| + | *_______. Individualism and the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Cato Institute, 1979. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE1_1_6.pdf ''Breaking out of the Walrasian Box: The cases of Schumpeter and Hansen.''] Reprinted in The Logic of Action II, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1987. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/rothbard/efficiency.asp " ''The Myth of Efficiency'']. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=1471 " ''The Myth of Efficient Government Service'']. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Israel M. Kirzner. [http://www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Kirzner/krzPV.html ''The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought.'']. Van Nostrand, 1960. Reprinted, Sheed and Ward, 1976. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Blanshard, Brand. [http://www.amazon.com/Reason-Analysis-Paul-Carus-Lectures/dp/0875481124/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1197648410&sr=8-2 ''Reason and Analysis''] Open Court Publishing Company, 1964. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Hollis, Martin and Edward J. Nell. [http://books.google.com/books?id=9G23xUw7NEIC '''''Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo- Classical. Economics.'''''] Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Leoni, Bruno and Eugenio Frola. [http://mises.org/journals/jls/1_2/1_2_3.pdf ''On Mathematical Thinking in Economics.''] Journal of Libertarian Studies 1.2 (1977): 101–9. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Lavoie, Donald C. [http://mises.org/journals/jls/1_4/1_4_6.pdf '''''From Hollis and Nell to Hollis and Mises.'''''] Journal of Libertarian Studies 1.4 (1977): 323-36. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Sen, Amartya. K. 1977. [http://www.jstor.org/cgi-bin/jstor/printpage/00483915/di984890/98p0161a/0.pdf?backcontext=page&dowhat=Acrobat&config=jstor&userID=c2502009@lancs.ac.uk/01c0a8486400509db11&0.pdfRational Fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory] Sen, A. K. (1977). Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Mario Rizzo. ''Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics''. In Louis M. Spadaro, ed., New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Walter Block. ''On Robert Nozick's 'On Austrian Methodology''. Inquiry 23 (1980). | ||
| + | |||
| + | *George A. Selgin. '''[https://mises.org/books/prax-and-understanding.pdf ''Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics'']'''. (pdf) Review of Austrian Economics 2 (1987) [http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/R2_2.PDF (pdf) ]. Reprinted LvMI 1990, 2008. ([http://mises.org/store/Praxeology-and-Understanding-P524.aspx [1]] mises store]), ([http://books.google.com/books?id=H2sYa8F19IEC google books]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | *David Gordon, [http://mises.org/philorig.asp ''The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics'']. Ludwig Von Mises Inst. 1993. (See also Mises Univesity 2010.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Raimondo Cubeddu, [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0415086477/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance " ''The Philosophy of the Austrian School'']. Routledge, 1993. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Kritik der kausalwissenschaftlichen Sozialforschung. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung von Soziologie und Ökonomie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1983. | ||
| + | *_______. ''Is Research Based on Causal Scientific Principles Possible in the Social Sciences?'' Ratio 25, no. 1 (1983). | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae3_1_16.pdf ''In defence of extreme rationalism: Thoughts on Donald McCloskey’s The Rhetoric of Economics'']. The Review of Austrian Economics 3 (1989): 179-214. See also blog entry [http://www.criticalrationalism.net/2010/02/17/hans-hermann-hoppe-getting-popper-wrong/ http://www.criticalrationalism.net/2010/02/17/hans-hermann-hoppe-getting-popper-wrong/] ''Hans-Hermann Hoppe getting Popper wrong'']. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE3_1_16.pdf http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE3_1_16.pdf] ''In Defense of Extreme Rationalism: Thoughts on Donald Mccloskey's the Rhetoric of Economics'']. Review of Austrian Economics 3 (1989): 179-214. | ||
| + | *_______. ''A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism''. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. | ||
| + | *_______. ''On Praxeology and the Praxeological Foundations of Epistemology and Ethics''. In Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., ed., The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1989. | ||
| + | *_______. ''The Economics and Ethics of Private Property''. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.org/esandtam.asp '''''Economic Science and the Austrian Method''''']. 1995, reprinted 2007. ([http://mises.org/media/category/110Economic-Science-and-the-Austrian-Method audio]]) ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkJL6pOJgj8 youtube audio]). See also the Mises Univesity videos by Hoppe. Reviewed by Steven Yates. [http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/21/rp_21_11.pdf > ''Hans-Hermann Hoppe's Austrian Philosophy: Review of Economic Science and the Austrian Method'']. Reason Papers 21 (1996): 91-6. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae10_1_3.pdf ''On Certainty and Uncertainty, or: How Rational Can Our Expectations Be?''] The Review of Austrian Economics 10 (1997): 49–78. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Peter J. Boettke. [http://economics.gmu.edu/pboettke/pubs/articles/wrong.htm ''What is wrong with Neoclassical Economics (and what is still wrong with Austrian Economics)'']. To be published in Fred Foldvary, ed., Beyond Neoclassical Economics (Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996). | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Jr. Gerald P. O'Driscoll and Mario J. Rizzo. [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0415121205/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance ''The Economics of Time and Ignorance'']. Routledge, 1996. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Nicolai J. Foss. [http://mises.org/journals/scholar/Fossgame.PDF ''Austrian economics and Game theory'']. Foss, Nicolai. J. 1998. [http://mises.org/journals/scholar/Fossgame.PDF ''Austrian economics and Game theory''] DRUID Working Papers 98-28, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies. Also in The Review of Austrian Economics (: A Stocktaking and Evaluation) 13(1), 41–58. ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=60 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *O'Neill. [http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae3_2_2.pdf ''Radical Subjectivism: Not Radical, Not Subjectivist'']. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3.2 (Summer 2000). | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae3_4_1.pdf ''A Realist Approach to Equilibrium'']. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3.4 (Winter 2000). | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdfqjae2_4_1.pdf ''Economic Science and Neoclassicism'']. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2.4 (Winter 1999). | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/story/2799 ''Carl Menger: Pioneer of "Empirical Theory'']. Mises Daily December 29, 2007. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/daily/3578 ''How to Use Methodological Individualism'']. Mises Daily July 27, 2009. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Rafe Champion. 2002. [http://www.the-rathouse.com/RC_PopperPaper.html ''Austrian Economics as a Popperian Research Programme'']. Paper for Popper Centenary Conference, 2002. ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=62 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | ||
| − | == | + | *Stephen Parsons, [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0415246938/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance ''Money, Time and Rationality in Max Weber'']. Routledge, 2003. |
| − | + | *Gene Callahan, [http://mises.org/story/1835 ''Scientism Standing in the Way of Science: An Historical Precedent To Austrian Economics'']. Mises Daily, June 09, 2005 | |
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *Steven Yates. [https://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae8_3_3.pdf ''What Austrian Scholars Should Know About Logic (and Why)'']. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8.3 (Fall 2005). | |
| − | * | + | *Stephan Kinsella. 2006. [http://blog.mises.org/archives/005430.asp ''The Other Fields of Praxeology: Games, war, voting and ethics?'']. Mises Economics Blog. |
| + | *_______. 2007. [http://blog.mises.org/archives/006154.asp ''Extreme Praxeology'']. Mises Economics Blog. | ||
| − | * | + | *Roderick T. Long. 2004. [http://mises.org/pdf/asc/2004/long.pdf ''Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman.''] Austrian Scholars Conference 10. Ludwig von Mises Institute, March 2004. |
| + | *_______. n.d. [http://praxeology.net/antipsych.pdf ''Anti-Psychologism in Economics: Wittgenstein and Mises''].. Praxeology.net. | ||
| − | + | *Jesus Huerta de Soto. [http://mises.org/etexts/methodenstreit.pdf ''The Ongoing Methodenstreit of the Austrian School'']. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Volume 8, Number 1, March 1998, 75-113. Also in De Soto: "The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency", Routledge, 2009. ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=63 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | |
| − | + | *_______. [http://www.jesushuertadesoto.com/fronts/frontdynamic.htm ''The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency''] (Article). | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *Tibor R. Machan. [http://www.lewrockwell.com/machan/machan24.html ''The Myth of Market Failures'']. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *Plauché, Geoffrey Allan. [http://www.veritasnoctis.net/docs/aristotelianapriorism.pdf '''''On Praxeology and the Question of Aristotelian Apriorism.'''''] Working Paper presented at the Austrian Scholars Conference. Ludwig von Mises Institute. Auburn, AL. March 16-18, 2006.. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | * | + | *Ludwig van den Hauwe. [http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/6965.html ''John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability.''] Germany: University Library of Munich, MPRA Paper 6965. revised 31 Aug 2007. |
| − | * | + | *Gennady Stolyarov II. [http://www.quebecoislibre.org/06/060205-5.html ''Praxeology and Certainty of Knowledge.''] Rational Argumentator, Issue XLIV, December 7, 2005. |
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/daily/2097 ''Doubt the Action Axiom? Try to Disprove It'']. Mises Daily, April 05, 2006. | ||
| + | *_______. 2007. [http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae10_2_4.pdf ''The compatibility of Hoppe's and Rothbard's views on the action axiom'']. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 10.2 (Summer 2007). | ||
| − | * | + | *Joseph T. Salerno, [http://mises.org/etexts/caldwellresponse.pdf ''The General Equilibrium Tradition in Austrian Economics'']. This paper was prepared for a Festscrift issue of the Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines in honor of Israel M. Kirzner. |
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/story/2740 '''''What is a Causal-Realist Approach?''''']. Mises Daily October 08, 2007 with video. | ||
| − | + | *Robert Wutscher. [http://mises.org/journals/scholar/Wutscher.pdf ''Foundations in Economic Methodologies: The Use of mathematics by mainstream economics and its methodology by Austrian economists'']. Economics Honours Long Paper, Department of Economics, University of Cape Town, 2005. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *Crovelli, Mark.R. 2006 [http://mises.org/story/2198 ''The Trouble with Axelrod: The Prisoners' Utility Cannot be Measured or Compared'']. Daily Article, LvMI. | |
| − | * | + | |
| − | + | *Michael Rozeff. 2006. [http://mises.org/story/2249 ''What do Austrians Mean by "Rational"?'']. Daily Article, LvMI. ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=61 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | * | + | *Chernikov, Dimitry. 2007. [http://mises.org/story/2669 ''The Trouble with David Friedman's 'Rationality'''] LvMI. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | *Peter T. Leeson and Peter J. Boettke [http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/publication/Mises.pdf ''Was Mises Right? Philosophical Progress and the Methodology of Economic Science'']. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | *Roderick T. Long. [http://mises.org/journals/scholar/long.pdf Wittgenstein, Austrian Economics, and the Logic of Action.]. PRAXEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | *Barry Smith [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/menger.html ''Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics'']. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==== Mises University ==== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | *[http://mises.org/media/categories/17/Mises-University Mises University Media Archives]. | |
| + | |||
| + | *Hans-Hermann Hoppe. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BojfG6fmYEU ''Praxeology: The Austrian Method - Introduction to Austrian Economics'']. Video recorded in 2005 | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiXcO3pcR8I '''''Praxeology: The Austrian Method''' | Hans-Hermann Hoppe''] Video from Mises University 2009 ([http://mises.org/media/4348 download]). | ||
| + | *_______. [http://mises.org/media/1810 Praxeology: ''The Austrian Method'']. Audio from Mises University 2006. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTXxvWa11Lg '''''Praxeology: The Method of Economics''''']. Video from Mises University 2011. | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3FdvqZFHG0 '''''The Science of Human Action''''']. Video from Mises University 2011. | ||
| + | *David Gordan. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePu2bx-XXdQ ''Praxeology: The Austrian Method / David Gordan''] Video from Mises University 2010. | ||
| + | *Roderick Long. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqmLpjErf6E Praxeology: The Austrian Method | Roderick T. Long]. Audio of Mises University 2007. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Thomas Woods Jr. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7ZVsKJv-cY ''Praxeology with Thomas Woods'']. Video from [http://www.google.com/search?q=Free+Market+Economics+101&hl=de&safe=off&prmd=iv&source=univ&tbs=vid:1&tbo=u&ei=Cpn3TJOmFJDG4AbHi6GFBw&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQqwQwAA#q= "Free+Market+Economics+101"&hl=de&safe=off&prmd=iv&source=lnms&tbs=vid:1&ei=jpn3TOAbwYXkBvWp6K0H&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&ved=0CAwQ_AU&fp=2e04738f5df9bc6d Free Market Economics 101] in Kansas, Wichita, 2009. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | < | + | |
| + | ==== See also ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Molinari Institute. [http://praxeology.net/anarcres.htm ''About'']. | ||
| + | *Long, Roderick T. n.d. [http://www.praxeology.net/praxeo.htm '''''What the Hell is Praxeology?'''''] Linklist of Praxeology.net. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Knott, [http://www.praxeology.org/ ''Praxeology'']. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=127 ''Austrian Methodology for the Social Sciences'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=3 ''Methodological Foundations'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=4 ''Subjectivism and the Theory of Value'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=26 ''B4 - Economic Methodology'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=27 ''B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=28 ''C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=29 ''C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=30 ''C6 - Mathematical Methods and Programming'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | *Mises Institute. [https://mises.org/literature.aspx?action=subject&Id=31 ''C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory'']. Linklist. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Argumentation Ethic === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Hans-Hermann Hoppe. “On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property,” ch. 10 of [http://www.hanshoppe.com/publications/#econ-ethics " ''The Economics and Ethics of Private Property'']. (Kluwer, 1993) (earlier version published as "[http://http://www.hanshoppe.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/hoppe_ult_just_liberty.pdf The Ultimate Justification of the Private Property Ethic],” [http://mises.org/journals/liberty/Liberty_Magazine_September_1988.pdf ''Liberty'' 2.1, (September 1988)]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *_______. [http://jorgevalin.blogspot.com/2007/06/hoppe-la-justificacin-ltima-de-la-tica.html ''La Justificación Última de la Ética de Propiedad Privada'']. (Spain) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *_______. [http://www.hanshoppe.com/publications/sel-topics/#arg-ethics Hoppe's link list]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Stephan Kinsella. [http://www.anti-state.com/kinsella/kinsella1.html ''Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan''] | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/undeniable.php ''The Undeniable Morality of Capitalism'']. (Review Essay of: The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy by Hans-Hermann Hoppe. | ||
| + | *Gene Callahan. [http://mises.org/daily/2025 ''What Is A Priori Science, and Why Does Economics Qualify As One?'']. Mises Daily, February 09, 2006. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Frank van Dun. [http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/ ''Argumentation Ethics and The Philosophy of Freedom'']. Libertarian Papers 1.19 (2009). ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=79 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Marian Eabrasu. [http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/20-eabrasu-critiques-argumentation-ethics/ ''A Reply to the Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics'']. Libertarian Papers 1.20 (2009). ([http://www.apriorist.de/modx/index.php?id=80 <span style="color: green">Abstract</span>]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Hans-Hermann Hoppe. [http://www.mises.de/texte/Hoppe/Eigentum/Kapitel4/index.html ''Die Grundlagen der Eigentumstheorie, Kapitel 4'']''in ''Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat - Studien zur Theorie des Kapitalismus'', 1987.'' | ||
| + | *_______. [http://www.mises.de/texte/Hoppe/Eigentum/index.html Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat - Studien zur Theorie des Kapitalismus]. 1987. | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Einzelnachweise = | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Wissenschaft]] | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 3. Juni 2022, 05:01 Uhr
Vergleiche diese Informationen mit dem "Praxeology"-Eintrag im Mises Wiki. [1]
Praxeologie beruht auf einem apriorischen, erkenntnistheoretischen Konzept, das verständlich macht, dass das Handeln als Begriff dient, um grundlegende Zusammenhänge zwischen Lebenswelt, unseren Sinnen und dem Verstand einordnen zu können. Der Begriff des Handelns versteht sich als logische Brücke zwischen Außenwelt (Sinnen, Wahrnehmung) und Innenwelt (Verstand). Diese logische Verknüpfung erlaubt eine wachsende, in sich konsistente Theorie zu entfalten, die die Grundlage für alle Wissensbereiche bildet.[2]
Die erkenntnistheoretischen Grundlagen werden täglich durch das Handeln (Hypothesen, Forschungsdesign, Verifikation und Falsifikation usw.) praktiziert. Diese Praxis ist im erweiterten Sinne wie Versuchstechnik zu verstehen - eine Theorie und Technik, um Versuche anzuordnen und auszuwerten - oder irgend eine Erkenntnis mit logischen Werkzeugen zu ermitteln (d.h. zu verstehen). Da die Aufstellung dieser Grundlagen Handlungen sind, kann der Begriff der Handlung selbst nicht mehr eliminiert werden, sondern ist bereits inhärenter, denknotwendiger Bestandteil.
Diese Methodik steht in mancher Hinsicht im Gegensatz zum üblichen Empirismus, beim dem Erkenntnis freilich nicht a priori, sondern ex post geschöpft wird. Die Praxeologie erlaubt es, den apriorischen Anteil unseres Wissens in allen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen sauber abzuleiten, was insbesondere in den Sozialwissenschaften von Interesse ist. Auch jede handwerkliche Tätigkeit wird durch praxeologische Erkenntnisse begleitet, weil es um wählbare Mittel zur Zielerreichung geht. Damit diese speziellen Mittel des Handelns überhaupt gedacht und gewählt werden können, implizieren sie ihrerseits notwendige Prämissen.[3] Die Grundlagen solcher Tätigkeiten lassen sich daher stets apriorisch beschreiben, wenngleich diese Tatsache in unserem Alltag so selbstverständlich erscheint, dass sie uns nicht einmal auffallen muss.
Was ist nicht praxeologisch?
Nicht praxeologisch ist jeder Versuch, Theorien und Annahmen zu kreieren und zu etablieren, der mit den denknotwendigen Voraussetzungen des Handelns (auch 'Axiom des Handelns' genannt) im Widerspruch steht. Das 'Axiom des Handelns' ist ein Paket von interdisziplinären Sub-Paketen begrifflicher Voraussetzungen möglicher Handlungen. Rechnen, Zählen und Messen sind zum Beispiel ebenfalls Handlungen ebenso wie mit anderen Menschen freiwillig zu kooperieren. Alle diese Handlungen setzen a priori die damit notwendigen Prämissen voraus.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellen
Order, Cooperation, Justice
- Norbert Lennartz. Praxeologie für Ordnung uns Sezession - Ergänzung zu Human Action. Holzinger, 2014.
- Konrad S. Graf Action-Based Jurisprudence with speech at Australian Mises Seminar 2012.
- ________. “Action-Based Jurisprudence: Praxeological Legal Theory in Relation to Economic Theory, Ethics, and Legal Practice”. Libertarian Papers 3.19 (2011).
Austrian Methodology
- Eugen-Maria Schulak, Herbert Unterköfler. Praxeology: A New Start from Ludwig von Mises Chp. 20 in The Austrian School of Economics: A History of Its Ideas, Ambassadors, and Institutions. Mises Inst. 2011.
- Richard von Strigl. Die ökonomischen Kategorien und die Organisation der Wirtschaft. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1923.
- Robbins, Lionel. (An Essay on) the Nature and the Significance of Economic Science. New York: New York University Press, 1984. (London: Macmillan, 1935).
- Ludwig von Mises. Part One. in Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 1996 (first edition 1949), preceded by Nationalökonomie in 1940.
- _______. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of the Economic Science.
- _______. 1933. The Epistemological Problems of Economics. 1933, 1960.
- _______. Epistemological Problems Of Economics.
- _______. Grundprobleme der Nationalökonomie. (German)
- _______. Remarks on the Fundamental Problem of the Subjective Theory of Value.
- _______. Bemerkungen zum Grundproblem der subjektivistischen Wertlehre. (German)
- _______. " Theory and History. (Philosophy of Science, Epistemology)
- _______. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. (Philosophy of Science, Epistemology)
- F. A. Hayek. The Use of Knowledge in Society. 1945.
- Murray N. Rothbard "Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller." American Economic Review, December 1951.
- _______. 1957. In Defense of Extreme Apriorism. Southern Economic Journal 23, no. 3 (1957): 314-20.
- _______. 1976. " Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics. Austrian Economics, ed. Edwin G Dolan, Sheed & Ward.(html).
- _______. Individualism and the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Cato Institute, 1979.
- _______. Breaking out of the Walrasian Box: The cases of Schumpeter and Hansen. Reprinted in The Logic of Action II, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1987.
- _______. " The Myth of Efficiency.
- _______. " The Myth of Efficient Government Service.
- Israel M. Kirzner. The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought.. Van Nostrand, 1960. Reprinted, Sheed and Ward, 1976.
- Blanshard, Brand. Reason and Analysis Open Court Publishing Company, 1964.
- Hollis, Martin and Edward J. Nell. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo- Classical. Economics. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)
- Leoni, Bruno and Eugenio Frola. On Mathematical Thinking in Economics. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1.2 (1977): 101–9.
- Lavoie, Donald C. From Hollis and Nell to Hollis and Mises. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1.4 (1977): 323-36.
- Sen, Amartya. K. 1977. Fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory Sen, A. K. (1977). Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.
- Mario Rizzo. Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics. In Louis M. Spadaro, ed., New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978.
- Walter Block. On Robert Nozick's 'On Austrian Methodology. Inquiry 23 (1980).
- George A. Selgin. Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics. (pdf) Review of Austrian Economics 2 (1987) (pdf) . Reprinted LvMI 1990, 2008. ([1] mises store]), (google books).
- David Gordon, The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics. Ludwig Von Mises Inst. 1993. (See also Mises Univesity 2010.)
- Raimondo Cubeddu, " The Philosophy of the Austrian School. Routledge, 1993.
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Kritik der kausalwissenschaftlichen Sozialforschung. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung von Soziologie und Ökonomie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1983.
- _______. Is Research Based on Causal Scientific Principles Possible in the Social Sciences? Ratio 25, no. 1 (1983).
- _______. In defence of extreme rationalism: Thoughts on Donald McCloskey’s The Rhetoric of Economics. The Review of Austrian Economics 3 (1989): 179-214. See also blog entry http://www.criticalrationalism.net/2010/02/17/hans-hermann-hoppe-getting-popper-wrong/ Hans-Hermann Hoppe getting Popper wrong].
- _______. http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE3_1_16.pdf In Defense of Extreme Rationalism: Thoughts on Donald Mccloskey's the Rhetoric of Economics]. Review of Austrian Economics 3 (1989): 179-214.
- _______. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
- _______. On Praxeology and the Praxeological Foundations of Epistemology and Ethics. In Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., ed., The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1989.
- _______. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
- _______. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. 1995, reprinted 2007. (audio]) (youtube audio). See also the Mises Univesity videos by Hoppe. Reviewed by Steven Yates. > Hans-Hermann Hoppe's Austrian Philosophy: Review of Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Reason Papers 21 (1996): 91-6.
- _______. On Certainty and Uncertainty, or: How Rational Can Our Expectations Be? The Review of Austrian Economics 10 (1997): 49–78.
- Peter J. Boettke. What is wrong with Neoclassical Economics (and what is still wrong with Austrian Economics). To be published in Fred Foldvary, ed., Beyond Neoclassical Economics (Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996).
- Jr. Gerald P. O'Driscoll and Mario J. Rizzo. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Routledge, 1996.
- Nicolai J. Foss. Austrian economics and Game theory. Foss, Nicolai. J. 1998. Austrian economics and Game theory DRUID Working Papers 98-28, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies. Also in The Review of Austrian Economics (: A Stocktaking and Evaluation) 13(1), 41–58. (Abstract)
- O'Neill. Radical Subjectivism: Not Radical, Not Subjectivist. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3.2 (Summer 2000).
- Jörg Guido Hülsmann. A Realist Approach to Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3.4 (Winter 2000).
- _______. Economic Science and Neoclassicism. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2.4 (Winter 1999).
- _______. Carl Menger: Pioneer of "Empirical Theory. Mises Daily December 29, 2007.
- _______. How to Use Methodological Individualism. Mises Daily July 27, 2009.
- Rafe Champion. 2002. Austrian Economics as a Popperian Research Programme. Paper for Popper Centenary Conference, 2002. (Abstract)
- Stephen Parsons, Money, Time and Rationality in Max Weber. Routledge, 2003.
- Gene Callahan, Scientism Standing in the Way of Science: An Historical Precedent To Austrian Economics. Mises Daily, June 09, 2005
- Steven Yates. What Austrian Scholars Should Know About Logic (and Why). Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8.3 (Fall 2005).
- Stephan Kinsella. 2006. The Other Fields of Praxeology: Games, war, voting and ethics?. Mises Economics Blog.
- _______. 2007. Extreme Praxeology. Mises Economics Blog.
- Roderick T. Long. 2004. Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman. Austrian Scholars Conference 10. Ludwig von Mises Institute, March 2004.
- _______. n.d. Anti-Psychologism in Economics: Wittgenstein and Mises.. Praxeology.net.
- Jesus Huerta de Soto. The Ongoing Methodenstreit of the Austrian School. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Volume 8, Number 1, March 1998, 75-113. Also in De Soto: "The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency", Routledge, 2009. (Abstract)
- _______. The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency (Article).
- Tibor R. Machan. The Myth of Market Failures.
- Plauché, Geoffrey Allan. On Praxeology and the Question of Aristotelian Apriorism. Working Paper presented at the Austrian Scholars Conference. Ludwig von Mises Institute. Auburn, AL. March 16-18, 2006..
- Ludwig van den Hauwe. John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability. Germany: University Library of Munich, MPRA Paper 6965. revised 31 Aug 2007.
- Gennady Stolyarov II. Praxeology and Certainty of Knowledge. Rational Argumentator, Issue XLIV, December 7, 2005.
- _______. Doubt the Action Axiom? Try to Disprove It. Mises Daily, April 05, 2006.
- _______. 2007. The compatibility of Hoppe's and Rothbard's views on the action axiom. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 10.2 (Summer 2007).
- Joseph T. Salerno, The General Equilibrium Tradition in Austrian Economics. This paper was prepared for a Festscrift issue of the Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines in honor of Israel M. Kirzner.
- _______. What is a Causal-Realist Approach?. Mises Daily October 08, 2007 with video.
- Robert Wutscher. Foundations in Economic Methodologies: The Use of mathematics by mainstream economics and its methodology by Austrian economists. Economics Honours Long Paper, Department of Economics, University of Cape Town, 2005.
- Crovelli, Mark.R. 2006 The Trouble with Axelrod: The Prisoners' Utility Cannot be Measured or Compared. Daily Article, LvMI.
- Michael Rozeff. 2006. What do Austrians Mean by "Rational"?. Daily Article, LvMI. (Abstract)
- Chernikov, Dimitry. 2007. The Trouble with David Friedman's 'Rationality' LvMI.
- Peter T. Leeson and Peter J. Boettke Was Mises Right? Philosophical Progress and the Methodology of Economic Science.
- Roderick T. Long. Wittgenstein, Austrian Economics, and the Logic of Action.. PRAXEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS.
Mises University
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Praxeology: The Austrian Method - Introduction to Austrian Economics. Video recorded in 2005
- _______. Praxeology: The Austrian Method | Hans-Hermann Hoppe Video from Mises University 2009 (download).
- _______. Praxeology: The Austrian Method. Audio from Mises University 2006.
- _______. Praxeology: The Method of Economics. Video from Mises University 2011.
- _______. The Science of Human Action. Video from Mises University 2011.
- David Gordan. Praxeology: The Austrian Method / David Gordan Video from Mises University 2010.
- Roderick Long. Praxeology: The Austrian Method | Roderick T. Long. Audio of Mises University 2007.
- Thomas Woods Jr. Praxeology with Thomas Woods. Video from "Free+Market+Economics+101"&hl=de&safe=off&prmd=iv&source=lnms&tbs=vid:1&ei=jpn3TOAbwYXkBvWp6K0H&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&ved=0CAwQ_AU&fp=2e04738f5df9bc6d Free Market Economics 101 in Kansas, Wichita, 2009.
See also
- Molinari Institute. About.
- Long, Roderick T. n.d. What the Hell is Praxeology? Linklist of Praxeology.net.
- Knott, Praxeology.
- Mises Institute. Austrian Methodology for the Social Sciences. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. Methodological Foundations. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. Subjectivism and the Theory of Value. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. B4 - Economic Methodology. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. C6 - Mathematical Methods and Programming. Linklist.
- Mises Institute. C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory. Linklist.
Argumentation Ethic
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe. “On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property,” ch. 10 of " The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. (Kluwer, 1993) (earlier version published as "The Ultimate Justification of the Private Property Ethic,” Liberty 2.1, (September 1988))
- _______. La Justificación Última de la Ética de Propiedad Privada. (Spain)
- _______. Hoppe's link list.
- Stephan Kinsella. Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan
- _______. The Undeniable Morality of Capitalism. (Review Essay of: The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.
- Gene Callahan. What Is A Priori Science, and Why Does Economics Qualify As One?. Mises Daily, February 09, 2006.
- Frank van Dun. Argumentation Ethics and The Philosophy of Freedom. Libertarian Papers 1.19 (2009). (Abstract)
- Marian Eabrasu. A Reply to the Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics. Libertarian Papers 1.20 (2009). (Abstract)
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Die Grundlagen der Eigentumstheorie, Kapitel 4in Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat - Studien zur Theorie des Kapitalismus, 1987.
- _______. Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat - Studien zur Theorie des Kapitalismus. 1987.
Einzelnachweise
- ↑ Die Ausführungen in der Wikipedia zu Hans Albert sind ohne Belang. Sie würden Nihilismus bedeuten.
- ↑ Warum die Praxeologie epistemologisch fundiert und unabwendbar ist, ist im 1. Kapitel von Praxeologie für Ordnung und Sezession erläutert.
- ↑ Das bedeutet nicht, dass die Mittelwahl apriorisch richtig sei, sondern dass unter der Voraussetzung der Mittelwahl schon bestimmte Grundannahmen implizit sind. Wird das Mittel als solches anerkannt, müssen auch diese Grundannahmen unter der Voraussetzung der Mittelwahl als richtig anerkannt werden.
