This page is still empty or containing little text and waiting for your contribution. It has already been created as a page to make it easier to start writing and to indicate that contributions about this issue are desired. If you wish to contribute, please go the following four steps: 1. register (click on top right link on this page to do so), 2. write an email to firstname.lastname@example.org to tell that you have done so and to be given editing rights, 3. click on one of the below headings to edit that page or choose one from the Contents page or create a new page (how to, see here).# 4. on that page click on "edit" in the top menu and the page will open to show a word processing version - Thank you for supporting this project. If you need help or explanations please see our Processing aids or Help in the menu on the left, or write an email.
Following is a text of a genetical engeneer about possible DNA contamination in vaccines, extracted from a youtube lecture:
"I'm sure all of you are aware what a vaccine is. Essentially, it's a virus in liquid that we inject. The viruses are long strands of RNA or DNA, thousands of RNA molecules or DNA molecules. It's too expensive to make the virus in a test tube. What the pharmaceutical companies do is they mimic nature's way of making viruses and they infect cells. The cells produce the virus and then they try to purify the virus away from the cellular material to put it in our final product. Anyone who has ever taken chemistry would know that no final product is ever pure. You would particularly know that when you go from a small scale manufacturing or production batch to a large scale batch your impurities increase dramatically in your final product.
In your final product there are contaminants from the cell that was used to make the virus. When we use chicken egg embryos there are contaminants from the chicken egg in the final vaccine. That chicken contaminant level is not human. We recognize it as foreign, we mount an immune response to it, and we eliminate it from our bodies. In the case when we are using human fetal cells to manufacture the vaccines, we have fragments of a retrovirus (because one of the babies from which the cells were taken had a retrovirus), we have large amounts of fragments of human DNA (primitive human DNA because it's fetal DNA) and in some cases the contaminants are at higher levels than the active ingredient of the vaccine.
That's alarming. What does that mean to a child who is injected with those materials? Two things are very possible and the science that demonstrates that these things happen is well established.
There's a chance that the child would have an immune response to that fetal material, because it's so close to that child (because it's human) that that immune response could turn on the child itself and become an autoimmune response. That's one danger. The second danger, which we believe is playing the predominant role in damage done to children, is a process called insertional mutagenesis. Those DNA fragments can insert into the genome of the child, create subsequent mutations and create problems. There are 30-40+ papers now looking at the genomes of children who have developed autism. These children have hundreds of "de novo" mutations. Those are mutations that their parents do not have. Science has established very clearly what can cause hundreds of diverse de novo mutations: radiation exposure, chemical toxin exposure, and foreign DNA exposure. The only one of those three that corresponds with the change points worldwide are the fetal manufactured contaminants."
— Theresa Deisher Ph.D, Genetic Engineer, President of Sound Choice Pharmaceuticals Institute, President & CEO of AVM Biotech