789 - 11. Statement - Revision history

Admin at 21:24, 14 January 2019

2019-01-14T21:24:58Z

Admin at 21:24, 14 January 2019

2019-01-14T21:24:23Z

Admin at 22:33, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T22:33:52Z

Admin at 19:50, 15 November 2018

2018-11-15T19:50:10Z

Admin at 19:46, 15 November 2018

2018-11-15T19:46:19Z

Admin at 19:39, 15 November 2018

2018-11-15T19:39:53Z

Admin at 13:44, 15 November 2018

2018-11-15T13:44:18Z

Admin at 13:43, 15 November 2018

2018-11-15T13:43:30Z

Admin at 22:06, 10 November 2018

2018-11-10T22:06:08Z

Admin: Created page with "'''back to Index''' 11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND IGNORES THE FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you..."

2018-08-20T19:22:17Z

Created page with "'''back to Index''' 11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND IGNORES THE FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you..."

New page

'''[[789-Bold_Statements|back to Index]]'''

11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND IGNORES THE FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY

Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust.(1) Their article on homeopathy is pure
propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science.
They have refused to allow to be included on their site. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of
equanimity and fair reporting.
They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased
detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and
there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective.
Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity?
Good addtions, but please edit this down to 3 or four sentences.
Click here to read the whole story about Wikipedia and how it has become corrupted and biased.

(1. article exposing corruption at Wikipedia)

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dysfunction-at-wikipedia_b_5924226 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dysfunction-at-wikipedia_b_5924226]
 &nbsp;
@@ Line 43: / Line 45: @@
 [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html]
 &nbsp;

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 14 January 2019
Line 43:		Line 43:

	[https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html]		[https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/05/23/more-about-wikipedia-corruption.html]
		+
		+	http://www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org/investigating-skeptics/wikipedia-captured-by-skeptics/wikipedia-new-technological-mccarthyism-part-1/

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''[[789-Bold_Statements|back to Index]]'''
-=11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND SYSTEMATICALLY IGNORES FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY =
+= 11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND SYSTEMATICALLY IGNORES FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY =
 Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust. During the last few years it has become obvious, that many articles in Wikipedia are target to systematic manipulation. Main targets are several political subjects, a few scientific and ecological ones and all forms of alternative medicine. Prominent among those the article about homeopathy, which is one of the two most controversial articles within the English speaking Wikipedia – next to the one on Jesus Christ.
 Click here <link to full story page> to read the whole story about Wikipedia and how it has become corrupted and biased.
-==Full story page on Wikipedia corruption==
+The article on homeopathy is pure propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of equanimity and fair reporting. They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective. Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity?
-The article on homeopathy is pure propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of equanimity and fair reporting. They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective. Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity?
+Would you believe that there is a group named “Guerrilla Scepticism on Wikipedia” with the only intent of manipulating the worldwide encyclopedia along the lines of a fundamentalist mechanistical world view?<br/> To read more about this group and see the proofs read [https://www.provings.info/blog1_en/?post_id=35&title=ebm-–-evidence-based-monsanto here].
-Would you believe that there is a group named “Guerrilla Scepticism on Wikipedia” with the only intent of manipulating the worldwide encyclopedia along the lines of a fundamentalist mechanistical world view?
+(… unfinished….)
-(… unfinished….)
+And in case you think, that bias, prejudice and fake-news is just random and not systematic in Wikipedia, read this:
 For complete information on Wikipedia see:
-https://www.freewiki.eu/en/index.php?title=Wikipedia
+[https://www.freewiki.eu/en/index.php?title=Wikipedia https://www.freewiki.eu/en/index.php?title=Wikipedia]
-http://www.truthwiki.org/wikipedia
+[http://www.truthwiki.org/wikipedia http://www.truthwiki.org/wikipedia]
-https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dysfunction-at-wikipedia_b_5924226
+[https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dysfunction-at-wikipedia_b_5924226 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dysfunction-at-wikipedia_b_5924226]
 &nbsp;
-One manipulation story that has reached the wide public is the one about the user “Philipp Cross”, a user account that has been used 10-14 hours a day, 7 days a week, even on Xmas and New Years Eve. Hardly imaginable that there is only one person behind this account, and if so he must be severly disturbed.
+One manipulation story that has reached the wide public is the one about the user “Philipp Cross”, a user account that has been used 10-14 hours a day, 7 days a week, even on Xmas and New Years Eve. Hardly imaginable that there is only one person behind this account, and if so he must be severly disturbed. See these sources:
-https://off-guardian.org/2018/05/15/wikipedia-takes-down-article-on-philip-cross-life-bans-author/
+[https://off-guardian.org/2018/05/15/wikipedia-takes-down-article-on-philip-cross-life-bans-author/ https://off-guardian.org/2018/05/15/wikipedia-takes-down-article-on-philip-cross-life-bans-author/]
-https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/
+[https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/ https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/]
-==for German speakers:==
+== for German speakers: ==
-The Wikipedia in German language seems to be even more under attack of manipulators than the English speaking one. For a full acount of what happens in the German Wikipedia see the movies on youtube “Die dunkle Seite der Wikipedia” (Wikipedia’s dark side) and “Zensur” by Markus Fiedler and Jens Speer, or watch the movies on Gruppe42.com.
+The Wikipedia in German language seems to be even more under attack of manipulators than the English speaking one. For a full acount of what happens in the German Wikipedia see the movies on youtube “Die dunkle Seite der Wikipedia” (Wikipedia’s dark side) and “Zensur” by Markus Fiedler and Jens Speer, or watch the movies on Gruppe42.com.<br/> Or see the pages about WikiImmunity, WikiWatch, Wikipedia on FreeWiki.eu.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 15 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	'''[[789-Bold_Statements\|back to Index]]'''
		+
	=11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND SYSTEMATICALLY IGNORES FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY =		=11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND SYSTEMATICALLY IGNORES FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY =
−

	Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust. During the last few years it has become obvious, that many articles in Wikipedia are target to systematic manipulation. Main targets are several political subjects, a few scientific and ecological ones and all forms of alternative medicine. Prominent among those the article about homeopathy, which is one of the two most controversial articles within the English speaking Wikipedia – next to the one on Jesus Christ.		Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust. During the last few years it has become obvious, that many articles in Wikipedia are target to systematic manipulation. Main targets are several political subjects, a few scientific and ecological ones and all forms of alternative medicine. Prominent among those the article about homeopathy, which is one of the two most controversial articles within the English speaking Wikipedia – next to the one on Jesus Christ.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 15 November 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	The article on homeopathy is pure propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of equanimity and fair reporting. They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective. Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity?		The article on homeopathy is pure propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of equanimity and fair reporting. They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective. Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity?
		+
		+	Would you believe that there is a group named “Guerrilla Scepticism on Wikipedia” with the only intent of manipulating the worldwide encyclopedia along the lines of a fundamentalist mechanistical world view?
		+	</br>To read more about this group and see the proofs read [https://www.provings.info/blog1_en/?post_id=35&title=ebm-–-evidence-based-monsanto here].
		+

	(… unfinished….)		(… unfinished….)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''[[789-Bold_Statements|back to Index]]'''
+=11. WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED AND IGNORES THE FACTS ABOUT HOMEOPATHY =
-Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust.(1) Their article on homeopathy is pure
+Sadly Wikipedia is no longer the unbiased internet site that you can trust. Their article on homeopathy is pure propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science. They have refused to allow to be included on their site. This is in direct violation of their stated principles of equanimity and fair reporting. They refuse to allow experts in the field to describe and define their own profession – they only allow biased detractors to write the definition. While it may be a controversial field, there are other controversial fields as well and there are ways to note the controversy and remain objective. Can you imagine if they allowed Atheists to write the definition of Christianity? Good addtions, but please edit this down to 3 or four sentences. Click here to read the whole story about Wikipedia and how it has become corrupted and biased.
-propaganda and an attack on the integrity of real science.
+For critical information on Wikipedia see:
- (1. article exposing corruption at Wikipedia)
+[http://www.truthwiki.org/wikipedia Truthwiki]